Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
Mais filtros










Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Sao Paulo Med J ; 137(4): 356-362, 2019.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31691768

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: The 2017 American College of Cardiology (ACC)/American Heart Association (AHA) guidelines on hypertension management recommend new stage 1 hypertension thresholds (130-139/80-89 mmHg) for starting antihypertensive treatment. OBJECTIVE: To analyze the impact of the 2017 ACC/AHA guidelines on patients' diagnoses within daily practice, in comparison with management using the 2018 European hypertension guidelines, regarding the new thresholds. DESIGN AND SETTING: Cross-sectional study conducted in a hypertension outpatient clinic at a tertiary-level public hospital. METHODS: The diagnosis of hypertension was defined separately using each guideline. The participants were patients who were attending the hypertension clinic, who were evaluated using the thresholds of two guidelines, based on cardiovascular risk factors, including age, gender, smoking status, diabetes mellitus, dyslipidemia, obesity, osteoporosis, chronic renal failure and family history of hypertension. RESULTS: After adapting the guidelines to the blood pressure values of our sample, 74.5% (n = 277) of the patients were diagnosed as hypertensive according to the blood pressure classification of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) guidelines published in 2018, while 91.1% (n = 339) of the patients were hypertensive according to the new 2017 ACC/AHA guidelines. Multivariate regression analysis revealed that the significant demographic and cardiovascular risk factors associated with hypertension, based on the 2018 European Society of Hypertension (ESH)/ESC guidelines, were age (odds ratio, OR: 1.027; 95% confidence interval, CI: 1.001-1.054; P = 0.042), obesity (OR: 4.534; 95% CI: 1.830-11.237; P = 0.001) and family history of hypertension (OR: 2.199; 95% CI: 1.252-3.862; P = 0.006). CONCLUSIONS: The factors associated with the definition of hypertension may vary through changing the threshold values.


Assuntos
Hipertensão/diagnóstico , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Instituições de Assistência Ambulatorial , Estudos Transversais , Feminino , Fidelidade a Diretrizes , Humanos , Hipertensão/tratamento farmacológico , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Análise Multivariada , Valores de Referência , Fatores de Risco , Sociedades Médicas , Estatísticas não Paramétricas
2.
São Paulo med. j ; 137(4): 356-362, July-Aug. 2019. tab, graf
Artigo em Inglês | LILACS | ID: biblio-1043433

RESUMO

ABSTRACT BACKGROUND: The 2017 American College of Cardiology (ACC)/American Heart Association (AHA) guidelines on hypertension management recommend new stage 1 hypertension thresholds (130-139/80-89 mmHg) for starting antihypertensive treatment. OBJECTIVE: To analyze the impact of the 2017 ACC/AHA guidelines on patients' diagnoses within daily practice, in comparison with management using the 2018 European hypertension guidelines, regarding the new thresholds. DESIGN AND SETTING: Cross-sectional study conducted in a hypertension outpatient clinic at a tertiary-level public hospital. METHODS: The diagnosis of hypertension was defined separately using each guideline. The participants were patients who were attending the hypertension clinic, who were evaluated using the thresholds of two guidelines, based on cardiovascular risk factors, including age, gender, smoking status, diabetes mellitus, dyslipidemia, obesity, osteoporosis, chronic renal failure and family history of hypertension. RESULTS: After adapting the guidelines to the blood pressure values of our sample, 74.5% (n = 277) of the patients were diagnosed as hypertensive according to the blood pressure classification of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) guidelines published in 2018, while 91.1% (n = 339) of the patients were hypertensive according to the new 2017 ACC/AHA guidelines. Multivariate regression analysis revealed that the significant demographic and cardiovascular risk factors associated with hypertension, based on the 2018 European Society of Hypertension (ESH)/ESC guidelines, were age (odds ratio, OR: 1.027; 95% confidence interval, CI: 1.001-1.054; P = 0.042), obesity (OR: 4.534; 95% CI: 1.830-11.237; P = 0.001) and family history of hypertension (OR: 2.199; 95% CI: 1.252-3.862; P = 0.006). CONCLUSIONS: The factors associated with the definition of hypertension may vary through changing the threshold values.


Assuntos
Humanos , Masculino , Feminino , Adulto , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Hipertensão/diagnóstico , Valores de Referência , Sociedades Médicas , Estudos Transversais , Análise Multivariada , Fatores de Risco , Estatísticas não Paramétricas , Fidelidade a Diretrizes , Instituições de Assistência Ambulatorial , Hipertensão/tratamento farmacológico
3.
J Eval Clin Pract ; 21(2): 313-9, 2015 Apr.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25659424

RESUMO

RATIONALE, AIMS AND OBJECTIVES: Hypertension (HT) is prevalent in Turkey and even with pharmacological interventions HT control rates do not meet guideline recommendations. We aimed to estimate the proportion of hypertensive patients who achieved target blood pressure (BP) and seek to determine the predictors responsible for failure of to reach goals. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective cohort study involving patients with HT. A total of 437 patients were identified with a current diagnosis of HT at baseline. All available predictors for BP improvements were included in the multivariate linear regression model. RESULTS: Follow-up data on HT goal achievements was available for 276 (63.1%) participants. Only 18.1% of the patients at the baseline visit, and 48.6% at the follow-up visit achieved the overall SBP/DBP targets specified by the JNC-8 guideline. Significant differences were determined by baseline and 1st visit measurements of mean SBP/DBP levels (P < 0.001, P < 0.001, respectively). DM and baseline SBP were positively associated with SBP improvement (ß = 8.410, P = 0.003; ß = 0.692, P < 0.001, respectively), whereas being prescribing more HT medications and being older were negatively associated with improvement (ß = -7.968, P = 0.005; ß = -5.707, P = 0.037; respectively). DM, baseline DBP and HT duration were positively associated with DBP improvement (ß = 4.539, P = 0.012; ß = 0.702, P < 0.001; ß = 0.023, P = 0.012; respectively), whereas additional HT medications and GFR values were negatively associated with improvement (ß = -5.682, P = 0.002; ß = -0.098, P = 0.005; respectively). CONCLUSIONS: Although the progress in achieving in BP targets was encouraging, only half of patients had reached the HT goals. Adequate pharmacological approaches and comprehensive management strategies should be implemented in hypertensive patients.


Assuntos
Anti-Hipertensivos/uso terapêutico , Hipertensão/tratamento farmacológico , Adulto , Fatores Etários , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Pressão Sanguínea , Índice de Massa Corporal , Doenças Cardiovasculares/epidemiologia , Comorbidade , Diabetes Mellitus/epidemiologia , Quimioterapia Combinada , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Insuficiência Renal Crônica/epidemiologia , Estudos Retrospectivos , Fatores de Risco , Fatores Sexuais , Fumar/epidemiologia , Turquia
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...